Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Avalanche forecasting requires knowledge of snowpack conditions and recent avalanche activity, but field observations are sparse across large mountain regions. We explore whether SNOWPACK simulations can predict avalanche activity mapped by synthetic aperture radar (SAR). We compiled five winters of Sentinel-1 avalanche detections across Norway and parts of Sweden, alongside SNOWPACK simulations forced by numerical weather predictions on a 20 x 20 km grid at different elevations and predefined slope angles. A transformer used five days of SNOWPACK outputs to predict the following day's SAR-detected Avalanche Activity Index (SAR-AAI). This index weights larger debris more heavily, spreads detections across possible occurrence dates and normalises by modelled runout area. The model was trained on four winters and evaluated on one validation winter. Regional mean predicted and reference SAR-AAI correlated at r = 0.803 after averaging over complete six-day periods. The model followed broad changes in time and space but produced smoother predictions and underestimated the strongest activity. Agreement at the 20 km cell scale was weaker (r = 0.549) after the same averaging. These results come from a single training run without evaluation on an untouched winter. Satellite observations also contain missed and false detections and uncertain timing. The results therefore do not establish operational forecast skill, but suggest that regional SNOWPACK simulations contain information about broad variations in satellite-observed avalanche activity.