Life sciences · Journal article
Human Gene Therapy · October 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Human gene therapy has been transformed by repurposing mobile genetic elements as tools for efficient gene delivery and precise genome modification. Viruses, transposons, and retrotransposons mobilize genetic material through distinct mechanisms with distinct advantages for genome engineering platforms with therapeutic potential. This review describes the mechanisms, performance characteristics, and translational relevance of nonviral methods of gene transfer and genome engineering, with emphasis on engineered systems such as the Sleeping Beauty (SB) and piggyBac (PB) DNA transposons, R2 retrotransposon-based platforms, CRISPR-associated transposons (CASTs), and prime editing (PE). Clinical trials using both SB- and PB-engineered cells have shown feasibility by demonstrating sustained therapeutic effect through stable transgene integration, such as CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies. These transposon-based vectors enable robust gene transfer for cell engineering, but are fairly promiscuous with respect to where in the genome they insert their genetic cargo. On the contrary, R2-derived systems and CASTs represent promising technologies for programmable insertion, but are still under preclinical development. CRISPR-based PE provides a distinct route to precise sequence correction without double-strand breaks and is particularly attractive for the correction of monogenic disorders. Taken together, these technologies define a continuum from natural genome mobility to clinically relevant genome engineering. Continued optimization of delivery, targeting, and editing fidelity will determine how rapidly these approaches move from experimental innovation into routine clinical use.