Loading
Life sciences · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 17, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Observational Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05566470). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Hacettepe University. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 34 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Rotator Cuff Tears. Interventions: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST: Assessment of Central Neuromuscular Dysfunction, Shoulder Physical Functionality and Psychological Factors. Primary outcome measures: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) , 1 day; The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) , 1 day; Connor-Davidson Psychological Resilience Scale (CDPRS) , 1 day; Depression, Anxiety, Stress-21 Scale (DASS-21) , 1 day. Brief summary: Considering the fact that The problems experienced by the patients are not only physiological but also psychological and social. Unfortunately, there is no sufficient study focus on all these concepts. Generally, studies focus on only physiological dimensions such as functional level, muscle strength and pain. The aim of this study, in addition to assessment methods commonly used for functional level, muscle strength and pain, is to evaluate central neuromuscular function on individuals who have undergone rotator cuff tear surgery with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Furthermore, psychological resilience, which is considered as a positive psychological trait, will also be evaluated. Until now, only one study has evaluated the role of psychological resilience in the postoperative process of rotator cuff surgery. This study has shown that the correlation between functionality and psychological resilience. As a result of our study, the influence of resiliency on postoperative outcomes following rotator cuff surgery will be determined and central neuromuscular function, shoulder functional level, and psychological resilience changes will be revealed in physiological and psychological concepts. Furthermore, this study may show that psychological resilience has a potential role on predicting functional level and pain. It is planned that the results obtained will guide the postoperative rehabilitation of rotator cuff surgery for further studies on multidimensional perspectives.