Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for sequential decision-making. Despite many high-profile successes in recent years, deep RL is known to be brittle. An emerging line of research attributes this brittleness to a loss of plasticity in neural networks. However, plasticity loss has so far been understudied in stochastic environments. We study this interplay systematically, training SAC agents on three DeepMind Control tasks augmented with controlled levels of observation and action noise. We find that plasticity-preserving methods increase learning robustness on the two harder tasks, with their advantage growing as observation noise increases, while combining resets with layer normalization underperforms resets alone at every observation noise level tested. Further, stochasticity can accelerate the loss of plasticity in harder environments, whereas in easier settings noise can act as a regularizer that sustains plasticity. Lastly, plasticity loss is most pronounced in the early stages of training. In the most challenging stochastic settings, TD instability rather than gradual plasticity loss becomes the dominant failure mode.