Life sciences · Journal article
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background Anticancer treatment-induced cardiovascular toxicity (CTox) represents a critical and emerging challenge in cardio-oncology. Cancer patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are a uniquely vulnerable population, facing additive cardiovascular (CV) risk from uremic milieu, polypharmacy, and cytotoxic therapy. No transcriptomics-based machine learning (ML) model mechanistically validated in the uremic vascular milieu has been reported for identifying candidate cardiovascular risk genes at the CKD–cancer intersection. We aimed to construct and mechanistically validate a precision multi-omics cardiovascular risk gene signature to support future individualized risk stratification in cancer patients with CKD. Methods Blood transcriptomic data (GEO; accession GSE40447; n = 24 breast cancer samples) were processed through differential gene expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and four machine learning algorithms (LASSO, random forest, SVM, XGBoost) to derive a four-gene cardiovascular risk signature (THBS1, S100A8, MMP9, ITGB3). An ensemble model integrating molecular variables was constructed. Immune cell infiltration was estimated by ssGSEA. In vitro mechanistic validation was performed by RT-qPCR in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; ATCC CRL−1730) stimulated with the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate (IS) at three concentrations (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mM, 24 h; n = 6 biological replicates per group), with dual-reference normalization to GAPDH and β -actin. Results A total of 487 DEGs were identified; the turquoise WGCNA module (r = 0.72 with CVD, p < 0.001) contained all four signature genes as hub nodes. The ensemble ML model achieved AUC=0.923 (training) and AUC=0.881 (validation). RT-qPCR demonstrated concentration-dependent upregulation of all four signature genes in IS-stimulated HUVECs, with statistically significant induction at ≥0.25 mM IS (THBS1 FC = 2.6 ± 0.3; S100A8 FC = 3.1 ± 0.4; MMP9 FC = 2.9 ± 0.4; ITGB3 FC = 1.9 ± 0.3 at 0.5 mM, all p < 0.01), confirming transcriptional responsiveness of the signature to uremic endothelial injury. Conclusions We identified and mechanistically validated—at bioinformatic and in vitro levels—a transcriptomics-machine learning four-gene cardiovascular risk signature (THBS1, S100A8, MMP9, ITGB3) in the context of uremic endothelial injury. These genes capture thrombo-inflammatory, endothelial, and matrix remodeling pathways shared between CKD-associated vascular toxicity and anticancer treatment-induced CTox, providing a mechanistically grounded candidate panel for future prospective clinical validation in cancer patients with CKD.