Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
This is a narrative review synthesizing preliminary findings from small mechanistic studies without primary outcome data, effect sizes, or comparative efficacy to establish clinical utility.
Rigorous psychometric validation of a self-report screening tool against a clinician-administered gold standard in a well-characterized trauma sample, with clear reporting of reliability, validity, and threshold performance metrics.
A single-arm pre-post study with large effect sizes in a real-world wartime setting, but lacking a control group and explicitly acknowledged methodological limitations that prevent stronger inference.
A feasibility and acceptability study using a SMART design with modest sample size and surrogate endpoints (acceptability ratings, retention); establishes that intervention delivery is viable but provides no efficacy data on clinical outcomes.
This is a computational genetics study using GWAS summary statistics and Mendelian randomization to explore shared genetic architecture between two conditions; it identifies associations and proposes causal directions but lacks direct clinical validation or mechanistic proof of the suggested relationships.
Systematic review of 15 quantitative studies synthesizes evidence that PMIE subtypes associate with distinct psychological outcomes, with betrayal-type PMIEs showing consistent associations with PTSD, depression, and anxiety across samples.
This is a protocol for a planned longitudinal cohort study with no results yet reported; it describes intended design and measurement but provides no outcome data, effect sizes, or evidence of efficacy or harm.
A structured narrative literature review synthesizing recent clinical evidence on intensive and massed PTSD treatment programmes, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.