Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A methodological critique identifying systematic vulnerabilities in an automated evaluation protocol, based on qualitative replication and new baselines, but lacking empirical quantification of the magnitude or prevalence of the shortcuts identified.
This is a journal commentary synthesizing two concurrent primary studies; it raises mechanistic questions about ATR's role in EMT and metastasis but does not itself present original empirical data or a definitive clinical trial result.