Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A prospective cohort study with clear methodology and meaningful effect sizes in a clinically relevant population, but limited by single-centre design, lack of blinding, and reliance on a non-standard sarcopenia definition that requires external validation.
This is an unrefereed arXiv preprint describing a novel optimization framework for LLM agents; it reports experimental results but lacks peer review and independent validation.