Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A decades-long national cohort study with rigorous dose reconstruction and dose-response analyses showing consistent elevated cancer risks aligned with international evidence, supporting established radiation protection models.
Small retrospective study (n=10) using synthetic CT to evaluate robustness of bolus strategies; demonstrates feasibility of the RegGAN approach but provides limited clinical evidence with marginal absolute differences and no hard clinical outcomes.
A single-centre retrospective observational study describing longitudinal service patterns during crises, without control group or randomisation; reports institutional volumes and technique shifts but lacks comparative effectiveness or causal inference.